Love fascinates; love frustrates. It’s a soft whisper or raging cyclone; an allegorical language innately understood yet defying all logical explanation.
As a child, love has only one meaning: your full and complete attention. Hungry, wet, or upset, babies cry until someone appears with food, dry clothing or hugs and kisses. And so a behavior is learned: stress expressed brings the pleasant reward of sudden attention, i.e. love.
In children, our “cry first” behavior is refined then battle tested. Who hasn’t witnessed with empathy, or sympathy, the embattled parent vs. a child in a full-blown tantrum or meltdown? The behavior demands attention, but is also testing the boundaries of unconditional love.
By adulthood, hopefully, most people come to the realization that attention falls far short of love. Yet attention alone is sometimes enough to escape our separateness – the feeling of being desperately alone. Unfortunately our self-serving and desperate need to feel connection also influences the key question we ask of love. Rather than seek out the answer to how can I love, in ignorance we plead to discover the secret to the question, how can I be loved. Few ever question their own capacity to love, but know intimately the importance of being loveable.
Getting to loveable in our society is conveniently assigned to gender. Social convention encourage men to be successful, to build wealth and grab for power. To be love worthy as a woman is to be attractive, fertile, and nice with sugar and spice. When not blessed with natural assets – beauty, sex appeal or a fat inheritance – we develop other social qualities. We work at being popular, or cultivate a pleasant personality as our flytrap for a beloved.
Given the right stimuli, love, or falling in love, is, in the eyes of most people, relatively easy. Under the influence of enough lust, alcohol, loneliness or accumulated boredom, even strangers can find themselves in love, or at least a close enough facsimile – sudden intimacy. What’s damn hard about love is finding, or attracting, the right object to love, or finding, or attracting, the right object to love us equally.
Seeing others as objects makes it relatively easy to consider ourselves as market commodities and justify our expectations for mutually favorable exchange on the love market. We choose the attractive man or ideal woman with an eye on qualities that return equal, or better, market value. Picking a partner becomes analogous to selecting stocks or bonds – today 1 in 5 new relationships get their start only after potential partners have evaluated a manifesto of personal assets on an online dating site. A sweet deal can enhance ones economic cache, advance their social rank, or provide a beautiful gene pool. Love, by default, becomes a dividend earned.
Cold and commoditized as modern mating may seem, at least it grants the privilege to choose the object desired. In many traditional societies and cultures love is never spontaneous, never a personal choice. Marriage is a ceremony that seals a contract between factions. A worthy match is counted in heads of livestock, parcels of land or measured in precious metals, not on whether two people are in love, or will ever find love amidst their appointed duty to custom.
Arranged, or self imposed, we all want to believe love can have a happy ending, but Erich Fromm serves up the callous truth. In The Art of Loving he writes, “There is hardly any activity, any enterprise, which is started with such tremendous hopes and expectations, and yet, which fails so regularly, as love. If it were the case with any other activity, people would endeavor to find the reasons for the failure, and learn to do better – or give up the activity altogether.”
And my heart said, Amen!
So why are we such pathetic love underachievers seemingly committed more to making money, or gaining success, prestige, and power? Love, in essence, is a profitless venture. We can’t make it happen, only fall into it with blissful ignorance.
It’s out of ignorance that once in love we can’t help but be human: we exploit attention wishing it to bring us love; we mistake or substitute passion and affection for love; we aim to fall in love as our goal while relationships become burdensome; we yearn for what we once took for granted but long to find again – unconditional love; we remain ignorant, even unconcerned, about our own capacity for loving, and we obsess, or lament, over what we believe is love’s true and only purpose, to make us happy.
In the pursuit of happiness love becomes a life consuming concern, but few ever reflect on the core question: how did I learn love? Children have no power over being loved and an infant can only interpret being fed, sheltered and cuddled as being loved. By nature, and blood, parents, offspring, siblings and relations have a loving bond built in. As we become individuals we gather strangers into our tribe to treasure as friends we love. To love thy neighbor as thyself is an ideal most believe elevates love in mankind beyond flesh, yet it’s ecstasy of the flesh – the transcendent experience of romantic love – that’s coveted as the key to personal joy, but romantic love chooses us, it happens to us, either by fate, or by cupid, we fall, like a helpless victim – in love.
How easy then to love? What skill is required beyond feeling, what practice necessary beyond experiencing the ride, what mastery required other than suffering the disappointments and heartbreaks, and what legacy is there to pass on when there is nothing to be learned? Yet in my own life, I wonder, how much suffering could have been averted, how much richer my experiences and my relationships had I been taught that love, like trigonometry, must be learned and studied, that loving is a labor chosen, a practice committed to over a lifetime, and an art mastered not only for the sake of our own happiness, but also for those tiny voices that cry for attention but want to understand the profound difference it would make to rephrase one question. To ask not what can love do for me, but ask instead, what capacity, what potential, do I possess to love?
I once believed love was but the rose, only to learn true love is the labor to seed, the patience to root and the devotion to accept even the thorns. ck








